Patrimonial Bureaucracy in Indonesia: Historical Roots, Institutional Manifestations, and Post-Reform Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58835/jspi.v6i2.722Keywords:
Patrimonial Bureaucracy, Indonesian Governance, Bureaucratic Reform, Merit System, Political PatronageAbstract
This study aims to examine the symptoms of Patrimonial Bureaucracy in the Indonesian government system, where this is the culture of Asian countries in general, especially regarding rewards, emotional closeness brought to the realm of bureaucracy and government. This article also aims to analyze the characteristics of patrimonial bureaucracy in Indonesia, the factors that drive it, and why various bureaucratic reform agendas have not fully succeeded in changing our bureaucratic system towards Weber's rational-legal model. This study uses a qualitative approach to library studies of various relevant academic literature, policy documents, reports of anti-corruption institutions, and investigative findings. This study found that patrimonial practices are manifested in the recruitment and promotion system based on connections (KKN), mass job mutations as a politics of rewards, and the use of public funds to strengthen patron-client networks. The main driving factors include the legacy of colonial and New Order bureaucracy, the weakness of the merit system, and the intervention of political party oligarchies into the bureaucratic machine. The impacts include inefficiency, budget leaks, poor public services, and the demoralization of professional civil servants. Patrimonial bureaucracy, characterized by personal relationships, patronage, and the mixing of public and private domains, remains a serious challenge in the post-reform Indonesian government system. Despite the Grand Design for Bureaucratic Reform 2010-2025 and the strengthening of the merit system through the Civil Servant Law, patrimonial resistance remains. This article concludes that bureaucratic reform in Indonesia requires political intervention and strengthening of public accountability.
Downloads
References
Albrow, M. (2005). Birokrasi. Tiara Wacana.
Amer, N., Fahmi Lubis, A., Hidayat Muhtar, M., Jillyan Edsti Saija, V., Suciani Putri, V., & Setiawan, B. (2024). Implications of the Constitution for Political Neutrality in the Dynamics of Law and Democracy. 10(2), 283–302. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31004/cdj.v4i4.19099.
Awaluddin, A. (2026). Dilema Penegakan Hukum Netralitas (ASN) dalam Pilkada di Kabupaten Dompu Pasca UU ASN 2023. 4(1).
Christensen, J. G., & Opstrup, N. (2018). Bureaucratic dilemmas: Civil servants between political responsiveness and normative constraints. Governance, 31(3), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12312
Darry, M., & Asri, D. (2022). Problematika netralitas Polri di era Jokowi: Keterlibatan dalam politik praktis dan bisnis. Jurnal Politik indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Politics), 8(1), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.20473/jpi.v8i1.33927
Diana, B., & Sigiro, B. S. (2025). Netralitas Pegawai Negeri Sipil Dari Pengaruh Politik Terhadap Birokrasi Pemerintahan Indonesia. Jurnal Administrasi Politik dan Sosial, 6(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.46730/japs.v6i1.204
Eichbaum, C., & Shaw, R. (2008). Revisiting politicization: Political advisers and public servants in westminster systems. Governance, 21(3), 337–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00403.x
Fadilah, U., & Saepudin, E. A. (2024). Profesi birokrasi hukum pemerintahan dalam etika pelayanan publik. RESJUSTITIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 253–265. Retrieved from resjustitia.lppmbinabangsa.id
Faedlulloh, D., & Duadji, N. (2019). Birokrasi dan Hoax: Studi Upaya Menjaga Netralitas Aparatur Sipil Negara di Era Post-Truth. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 15(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v15i3.566
Firnas, M. A. (2016). POLITIK DAN BIROKRASI: MASALAH NETRALITAS BIROKRASI DI INDONESIA ERA REFORMASI. 06.
Hidayatullah, A. (2024). The Challenge of Bureaucratic Neutrality in the 2024 Legislative and Presidential Elections in Indonesia. 05(1), 135–148.
Pedersen, K. H., & Johannsen, L. (2016). Where and How You Sit: How Civil Servants View C_i_t_i_z_e_n_s_’ _P_a_r_t_i_c_i_p_a_t_i_o_n_._ _Administration and Society, 48(1), 104–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714555753
Raharjo Jati, W. (1969). KULTUR BIROKRASI PATRIMONIALISME DALAM PEMERINTAH PROVINSI DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v8i2.86
Riyanto, M., Widodo, A., & Retnowinarni, R. (2023). Netralitas Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) dalam PILKADA untuk Mewujudkan Good Governance. Syntax Idea, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v5i11.2690
Robuwan, R., Agustian, R. A., & Daviska, D. (2025). Implikasi Hukum Administrasi Negara Terhadap Netralitas Aparatur Sipil Negara. Jurnal Fakta Hukum, 4(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.58819/jfh.v4i1.181
Setiyono, B. (2004). Birokrasi Dalam Perspektif Politik Dan Administrasi (2nd edn). Puskodak Undip.
Weber. (n.d.). Bureaucracy. University California Press. (Original work published 1979)
Wendy Wiraganti, R., Santoso, A., & Hijriatul Aulia, A. (2025). Analisis Politisasi Birokrasi Daerah Terhadap Netralitas Kinerja Aparatur Sipil Negara. Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law, 6(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.22437/mendapo.v6i1.39434
