The Shift in the Value of Geuchik Leadership in Aceh: An Analysis of the Transition from Charismatic to Formal Leadership
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58835/jspi.v6i2.704Keywords:
Geuchik leadership, Charismatic leadership, Village governance, Leadership transformation, AcehAbstract
This study aims to analyze the shift in the value of Geuchik leadership in Aceh from a charismatic and culturally grounded model toward a formal and procedural model of village governance. In the traditional Acehnese gampong system, the Geuchik was not only an administrative leader but also a respected social, cultural, and religious figure whose authority was built on charisma, maturity, community trust, and mastery of local customs. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach through observation, semi-structured interviews, and documentation, supported by a literature review and field data. The findings show that contemporary Geuchik selection increasingly prioritizes formal administrative requirements, such as age, educational certificates, and electoral procedures, rather than social stature, customary knowledge, and charismatic authority. This change has expanded democratic access to village leadership, including for younger and formally educated candidates. Still, it has also created a value gap between legal legitimacy and socio-cultural legitimacy. The decline of charismatic authority affects public respect, community compliance, dispute resolution, and the preservation of local wisdom. Therefore, the study argues that effective gampong leadership in Aceh requires a balance between formal governance capacity and culturally rooted leadership values.
Downloads
References
Abad Badruzzaman. (2009). From theology to action: Defending the weak and combating inequality. Pustaka Pelajar.
Aceh Government. (2025). Kasus korupsi di Aceh pada 2024 didominasi dana desa. InfoPublik Aceh.
Aceh Qanun Number 4 of 2009 concerning Procedures for the Election and Dismissal of Keuchik in Aceh.
Amrul Badri. (2025, January 8). Interview with cultural activist from Singkil.
Arifin, A. H. (2021). The influence of education and work experience on the performance of the Keuchik. Malikussaleh Social and Political Reviews.
Armansyah. (2022). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and work motivation. Azka Pustaka.
Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Banda Aceh. (2025). Kota Banda Aceh dalam angka 2025. BPS Kota Banda Aceh.
Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Aceh. (2025). Provinsi Aceh dalam angka 2025. BPS Provinsi Aceh.
Bintarto, R. (1989). Urban-rural interaction and its problems. Ghalia Indonesia.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Burhanudin (Aman Putri). (2025, October 10). Interview with community leader of Kemili, Central Aceh.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Danim, S. (2002). Becoming a qualitative researcher. Pustaka Setia.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fabela, Z., & Khairunnisa, A. (2024). The impact of social inequality in Indonesia. SENTRI: Scientific Research Journal, 3(6).
Fuady, F. (2025). Peran kepemimpinan Keuchik dalam meningkatkan partisipasi sosial aparatur gampong. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan.
Ihsan Fauzi. (2025, October 12). Interview with youth leader of Bener Meriah and a journalist.
Iskandar, M. (2019). The enforcement of gampong in the Qanun of Aceh and its implications for village governance. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan.
Iswahyudi, et al. (2023). Leadership styles. Yayasan Cendikia Mulia Mandiri.
Kamisa. (1997). Complete Indonesian dictionary. Kartika.
Karsayuda, M. R. (2016). The decentralization of political parties through the institutionalization of local political parties in Aceh. Constitutional Review.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Governing of Aceh.
Marlina, et al. (2024). Building restorative justice in gampong as a bottom-up mechanism in Aceh. Cogent Social Sciences.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mursyidin, M. (2022). Aceh's local elite power strategy in village government. Journal of Government and Politics.
Narwoko, J. D., & Suyanto, B. (2004). Sociology: Introductory and applied text. Prenadamedia Group.
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Pakeh, A. (2017). Peran kepemimpinan Keuchik dalam pembangunan di Gampong Jambak, Kecamatan Pante Ceureumen, Kabupaten Aceh Barat. Jurnal Public Policy.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Raihan, R. (2020). Metode kepemimpinan Keuchik dalam mencegah penyebaran Covid-19 di gampong. Al-Idarah: Jurnal Manajemen dan Administrasi Islam.
RMOL Aceh. (2025). Dana desa dominasi kasus korupsi di Aceh. RMOL Aceh.
Subarni, S. (2022). Pengaruh kepemimpinan Keuchik terhadap pemberdayaan ekonomi masyarakat gampong. Jurnal Ekonomika.
Sukamto. (1999). Kiai leadership. Pustaka LP3ES.
Sutikno, A. N. (2020). Demographic bonus in Indonesia. Visioner Journal, 12(2), 421-438.
Weber, M. (1922). Economy and society. University of California Press.
Widjaja, H. A. W. (2003). Village autonomy. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Wursanto. (2002). Fundamentals of organizational science. Andi.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
