Strategies for Strengthening Public Engagement in Monitoring Integrity Zone Development as an Effort to Achieve Good Local Governance

Authors

  • Lusi Puspika Sari Universitas Andalas
  • Andri Rusta Universitas Andalas
  • Yefri Reswita Universitas Andalas
  • Syaiful Syaiful Universitas Andalas
  • Muhammad Daffa Khoiri Universitas Andalas
  • Husni Alim Universitas Andalas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58835/jspi.v5i3.470

Keywords:

Public Engagement, Integrity Zones, Local Governance, Traditional Leaders, Transparency

Abstract

This study aims to analyze strategies for strengthening public engagement in monitoring the development of integrity zones as an effort to improve local governance. A qualitative approach was employed through in-depth interviews and documentary analysis, with research conducted in Solok City and Padang Panjang City, West Sumatra Province. The findings indicate that public participation in monitoring integrity zones remains limited and largely relies on informal mechanisms. Traditional leaders play a crucial role in disseminating information and encouraging compliance with integrity policies, although their involvement is not yet fully supported by a strong legal framework. Strengthening their role through formal regulations could enhance the effectiveness of public participation. Moreover, broader community involvement has the potential to reduce corruption, promote transparency, and reinforce accountability in local governance. This study contributes by providing empirical insights into how local social structures can be leveraged to support public oversight and by offering practical recommendations for policymakers to enhance governance through the synergy between formal and informal actors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barnes, W., & Mann, B. C. (2011). Making local democracy work: Municipal officials’ views about public engagement. National Civic Review, 100(3), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.20063

Cheema, S., & Rondinelli, D. A. (2007). Decentralizing Governance: Emerging Concepts and Practices. In Brookings Institution Press, Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/decentralizinggovernance_chapter.pdf

dwiyanto. (2021). Reformasi Birokrasi Publik di Indonesia. UGM PRESS. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Reformasi_Birokrasi_Publik_di_Indonesia.html?id=vTMXEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Haryanto, J. T. (2019). Civil society and anti-corruption movement in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian SocialSciences and Humanities, 9(2), 123–137.

Jeremy Pope. (2008). STRATEGI MEMBERANTAS KORUPSI (Edisi Ringkas). In Strategi Memberantas Korupsi (Edisi Ringkas). Perpustakaan Nasional RI. https://transparansi.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/StrategiMemberantasKorupsi.pdf

Nurmandi, A., & Kim, S. (2020). Local governance innovations and anti-corruption. Asian Journal of Political Science, 28(3), 265–283.

PermenpanRB. (2014). Tahun 2012 Tentang Pedoman Pembangunan Zona Integritas Menuju Wilayah Bebas Dari Korupsi Dan Wilayah Birokrasi Bersih Dan Melayani Di Lingkungan Kementerian/Lembaga Dan Pemerintah Daerah. Details/132770/Permen-Pan-Rb-No-52-Tahun-2014. https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/558%09unit-bebas-dari-korupsi-lahir- di-penghujung-tahun

Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2020). Governance, politics and the state. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Prasojo, E. (2016). Bureaucratic Reform and Good Governance in Indonesia. Public Policy and Administration Research, 6(6), 1–10.

Rochman, A., & Widianingsih, I. (2018). Public participation in integrity zone development. Jurnal Bina Praja, 10(2), 183–194.

Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30