Optimization of the Regulatory Framework to Attract Tertiary Sector Investment: A Policy Analysis in Garut Regency

Authors

  • Widaningsih Widaningsih Universitas Garut
  • Susi Adiawaty Institut Bisnis Nusantara Jakarta
  • Vivy Mawardy Institut Bisnis Nusantara Jakarta
  • Asmidar Lokman Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58835/jspi.v4i4.385

Keywords:

Tertiary Sector Investment, Regulatory Framework, Public Policy, Investment Climate, Policy Optimization

Abstract

The increase in investment in the tertiary sector, such as tourism, trade, and services, has become one of the strategic priorities of Garut Regency in driving regional economic growth. However, regulatory barriers, lack of legal certainty, and infrastructure challenges often pose major obstacles for investors. This study aims to analyze the existing regulatory framework, identify challenges in policy implementation, and offer recommendations for optimizing policies to attract more investment in the tertiary sector. This research employs a qualitative approach using a case study method. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 15 informants, including officials from the Investment and Integrated Licensing Service Office (DPMPT), local business actors, prospective investors, and academics. Data analysis was conducted using triangulation methods, which included policy document analysis, investment statistics, and insights from interviews. The results of the study show that despite Garut Regency's great potential in the tertiary sector, such as natural tourism and trade, investment policy implementation is still suboptimal. Major inhibiting factors include the complexity of licensing procedures, lack of synchronization between regional and national policies, and insufficient structured investment promotion. The study recommends streamlining regulations, digitalizing the licensing system, and strengthening coordination between local governments and stakeholders. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of optimizing an adaptive regulatory framework that aligns with investor needs. With more flexible and conducive policies, Garut Regency has the potential to become a leading destination for tertiary sector investment in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acemoğlu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2016). Paths to Inclusive Political Institutions. Studies in Economic History, 3–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1605-9_1

Bianconi, M., & Tan, L. (2010). Cross-listing premium in the US and the UK destination. International Review of Economics & Finance, 19(2), 244–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2009.09.004

Bird, D., & Fafchamps, M. (2004). Market Institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa: Theory and Evidence. In The International Journal of African Historical Studies (Vol. 37, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.2307/4129030

Clark, R., Reed, J., & Sunderland, T. (2018). Bridging funding gaps for climate and sustainable development: Pitfalls, progress and potential of private finance. Land Use Policy, 71, 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.013

Clemens, M. A., & McKenzie, D. (2018). Why Don’t Remittances Appear to Affect Growth? Economic Journal, 128(612), F179–F209. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12463

Dunn, W. (2003). Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Jogjakarta : Gadjah Mada University.

Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (2003). Tropics, germs, and crops: how endowments influence economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1), 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00200-3

Green, R. J., & Newbery, D. M. (1992). Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 929–953. https://doi.org/10.1086/261846

Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704040472

Johnson, David L., and M. M. (2024). “Financing Transformation: How to Sustain Place-based Economic Development Beyond Early Federal Awards.” The Brookings Institution. Feb. 23, 2024.

Jones, C. I. (2016). The Facts of Economic Growth. In Handbook of Macroeconomics (Vol. 2, pp. 3–69). https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hesmac.2016.03.002

Kaplow, L., & Shavell, S. (2001). Any Non‐welfarist Method of Policy Assessment Violates the Pareto Principle. Journal of Political Economy, 109(2), 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1086/319553

Kaufmann, D., Kray, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2008). Governance Matters VII: Governance Indicators for 1996-2007, World Bank Policy Research (Issue September).

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15(1), 222–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/15.1.222

Lécaillon, J., Meier, G. M., & Lecaillon, J. (1971). Leading Issues in Economic Development. Revue Économique, 22(4), 711. https://doi.org/10.2307/3500053

Lima, G. T., & Meirelles, A. J. A. (2007). Macrodynamics of debt regimes, financial instability and growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(4), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bel042

Lott, J. R., & North, D. C. (1992). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. In Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (Vol. 11, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.2307/3325144

Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946696

Nayar, S., & Stanley, M. (2014). Qualitative research methodologies for occupational science and therapy. In Qualitative Research Methodologies for Occupational Science and Therapy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203383216

Parilla, J., & Muro, M. (n.d.). Finding a long-term place for’place-based’development strategy.

Parilla, J., Takeuchi, M., & Haskins, G. (2024). Metro Monitor 2024: Is metropolitan America benefitting from national growth?.

Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (2003). The great reversals: The politics of financial development in the twentieth century. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(1), 5–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00125-9

Rodrik, D. (2018). Populism and the economics of globalization. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(1–2), 12–33. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-018-0001-4

Scott, W.R., 1995. (1995). Symbols and organizations: from Barnard to the institutionalists. Organization theory: from Chester Barnard to the present and beyond,.

Sidanius, J., Feshbach, S., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. (1997). The interface between ethnic and national attachment: Ethnic pluralism or ethnic dominance? Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(1), 102–133. https://doi.org/10.1086/297789

Turner, L. (1991). The competitive advantage of nations. In International Affairs (Vol. 67, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2621245

Williamson, O., & Looking, , Stock. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Journal of Economic Literature, .

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30