Optimization of the Regulatory Framework to Attract Tertiary Sector Investment: A Policy Analysis in Garut Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58835/jspi.v4i4.385Keywords:
Tertiary Sector Investment, Regulatory Framework, Public Policy, Investment Climate, Policy OptimizationAbstract
The increase in investment in the tertiary sector, such as tourism, trade, and services, has become one of the strategic priorities of Garut Regency in driving regional economic growth. However, regulatory barriers, lack of legal certainty, and infrastructure challenges often pose major obstacles for investors. This study aims to analyze the existing regulatory framework, identify challenges in policy implementation, and offer recommendations for optimizing policies to attract more investment in the tertiary sector. This research employs a qualitative approach using a case study method. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 15 informants, including officials from the Investment and Integrated Licensing Service Office (DPMPT), local business actors, prospective investors, and academics. Data analysis was conducted using triangulation methods, which included policy document analysis, investment statistics, and insights from interviews. The results of the study show that despite Garut Regency's great potential in the tertiary sector, such as natural tourism and trade, investment policy implementation is still suboptimal. Major inhibiting factors include the complexity of licensing procedures, lack of synchronization between regional and national policies, and insufficient structured investment promotion. The study recommends streamlining regulations, digitalizing the licensing system, and strengthening coordination between local governments and stakeholders. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of optimizing an adaptive regulatory framework that aligns with investor needs. With more flexible and conducive policies, Garut Regency has the potential to become a leading destination for tertiary sector investment in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Acemoğlu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2016). Paths to Inclusive Political Institutions. Studies in Economic History, 3–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1605-9_1
Bianconi, M., & Tan, L. (2010). Cross-listing premium in the US and the UK destination. International Review of Economics & Finance, 19(2), 244–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2009.09.004
Bird, D., & Fafchamps, M. (2004). Market Institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa: Theory and Evidence. In The International Journal of African Historical Studies (Vol. 37, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.2307/4129030
Clark, R., Reed, J., & Sunderland, T. (2018). Bridging funding gaps for climate and sustainable development: Pitfalls, progress and potential of private finance. Land Use Policy, 71, 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.013
Clemens, M. A., & McKenzie, D. (2018). Why Don’t Remittances Appear to Affect Growth? Economic Journal, 128(612), F179–F209. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12463
Dunn, W. (2003). Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Jogjakarta : Gadjah Mada University.
Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (2003). Tropics, germs, and crops: how endowments influence economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1), 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00200-3
Green, R. J., & Newbery, D. M. (1992). Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 929–953. https://doi.org/10.1086/261846
Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704040472
Johnson, David L., and M. M. (2024). “Financing Transformation: How to Sustain Place-based Economic Development Beyond Early Federal Awards.” The Brookings Institution. Feb. 23, 2024.
Jones, C. I. (2016). The Facts of Economic Growth. In Handbook of Macroeconomics (Vol. 2, pp. 3–69). https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hesmac.2016.03.002
Kaplow, L., & Shavell, S. (2001). Any Non‐welfarist Method of Policy Assessment Violates the Pareto Principle. Journal of Political Economy, 109(2), 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1086/319553
Kaufmann, D., Kray, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2008). Governance Matters VII: Governance Indicators for 1996-2007, World Bank Policy Research (Issue September).
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15(1), 222–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/15.1.222
Lécaillon, J., Meier, G. M., & Lecaillon, J. (1971). Leading Issues in Economic Development. Revue Économique, 22(4), 711. https://doi.org/10.2307/3500053
Lima, G. T., & Meirelles, A. J. A. (2007). Macrodynamics of debt regimes, financial instability and growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(4), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bel042
Lott, J. R., & North, D. C. (1992). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. In Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (Vol. 11, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.2307/3325144
Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946696
Nayar, S., & Stanley, M. (2014). Qualitative research methodologies for occupational science and therapy. In Qualitative Research Methodologies for Occupational Science and Therapy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203383216
Parilla, J., & Muro, M. (n.d.). Finding a long-term place for’place-based’development strategy.
Parilla, J., Takeuchi, M., & Haskins, G. (2024). Metro Monitor 2024: Is metropolitan America benefitting from national growth?.
Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (2003). The great reversals: The politics of financial development in the twentieth century. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(1), 5–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00125-9
Rodrik, D. (2018). Populism and the economics of globalization. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(1–2), 12–33. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-018-0001-4
Scott, W.R., 1995. (1995). Symbols and organizations: from Barnard to the institutionalists. Organization theory: from Chester Barnard to the present and beyond,.
Sidanius, J., Feshbach, S., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. (1997). The interface between ethnic and national attachment: Ethnic pluralism or ethnic dominance? Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(1), 102–133. https://doi.org/10.1086/297789
Turner, L. (1991). The competitive advantage of nations. In International Affairs (Vol. 67, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2621245
Williamson, O., & Looking, , Stock. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Journal of Economic Literature, .
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Widaningsih Widaningsih, Susi Adiawaty, Vivy Mawardy, Asmidar Lokman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.