Synergizing Advocacy and Communication: A Strategic Model for Sustainable Development in Non-Governmental Organizations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58835/jspi.v4i3.340Keywords:
Advocacy and Communication, Non-Governmental Organizations, Sustainable Development, Strategy EffectivenessAbstract
This study examines the effectiveness of advocacy and communication strategies employed by the Bojonegoro Institute in Bojonegoro and WALHI in Bangka Belitung, focusing on their impact across social, economic, environmental, and political dimensions. Advocacy and communication are pivotal, interdependent components in addressing environmental and social issues caused by institutional or corporate operations. The research adopts a descriptive qualitative methodology, utilizing in-depth, unstructured interviews with purposive sampling to identify key informants. The findings reveal that advocacy and communication significantly contribute to the existence and success of non-governmental organizations (NGOs). The Bojonegoro Institute’s advocacy promotes equitable and sustainable governance in the oil and gas sector, while WALHI in Bangka Belitung pushes for environmental crisis mitigation through governmental policy interventions. Socially, both organizations enhance public awareness of environmental and social issues. Economically, the Bojonegoro Institute boosts local productivity, investment appeal, and income levels, whereas WALHI’s initiatives enhance tourism, agricultural production, and economic resilience. Environmentally, these organizations strengthen conservation efforts and public environmental consciousness. Politically, their strategic advocacy facilitates policy-making for regional sustainability. In conclusion, effective advocacy and communication strategies enable NGOs to achieve their objectives and provide substantial positive impacts across multiple aspects of regional development. The synergy of these strategies reinforces their pivotal role in fostering societal well-being and environmental stewardship
Downloads
References
Anto, A. (2024). Impacts and Challenges of Implementing Ecological Fiscal Transfers: A Systematic Literature Review of Indonesia’s Policies.
Aulia, F., & Kusumasari, B. (2022). Tunda Pilkada: Apakah Advokasi Digital Berhasil Memengaruhi Proses Pembuatan Kebijakan? Jurnal Komunikasi, 16(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol16.iss2.art4
Brady-Amoon, P. (2011). Humanism, feminism, and multiculturalism: Essential elements of social justice in counseling, education, and advocacy. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, 50(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1939.2011.tb00113.x
Carmichael, J. T., & Brulle, R. J. (2017). Elite cues, media coverage, and public concern: an integrated path analysis of public opinion on climate change, 2001–2013. Environmental Politics, 26(2), 232–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1263433
Chapman, S., & Freeman, B. (2020). Media advocacy for policy influence. In I. Kawachi, I. Lang, & W. Ricciardi (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Public Health Practice (pp. 340–347). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198800125.003.0031
Crow, D. A., & Lawlor, A. (2016). Media in the Policy Process: Using Framing and Narratives to Understand Policy Influences. Review of Policy Research, 33(5), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12187
De Bruycker, I. (2019). Blessing or Curse for Advocacy? How News Media Attention Helps Advocacy Groups to Achieve Their Policy Goals. Political Communication, 36(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1493007
Dunayer, Joan. (2020). Mixed Messages: Opinion Pieces by Representatives of US Nonhuman-Advocacy Organizations JOAN DUNAYER. In Critical Animal and Media Studies (pp. 105–120). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731674-15
Fitriasari, S., Masyitoh, I. S., & Baeihaqi. (2020). The Role of Pancasila Education Teachers and Citizenship in Strengthening Character Education Based on Pancasila Values. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Civic Education Conference (ACEC 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200320.101
Hall, N., Schmitz, H. P., & Michael Dedmon, J. (2020). Transnational advocacy and NGOs in the digital era: New forms of networked power theory note. International Studies Quarterly, 64(1), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqz052
Hampel, G. (2022). Effective Court Room Communication. In Victim Advocacy before the International Criminal Court (pp. 79–93). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56733-0_7
Harirah., Z. (2023). Pergulatan Advokasi Kebijakan Pengarusutamaan Gender di Kota Pekanbaru. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58835/jspi.v3i3.200
Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic Review. Research in Nursing and Health, 40(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768
Laluma, R. H. (2015). Perancangan It Master Plan Studi Kasus: Wahana Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia (Walhi).
McNutt, J. G. (2016). Advocacy and Policy Influence. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 1–5). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2608-1
Men, L. R. (2014). Why Leadership Matters to Internal Communication: Linking Transformational Leadership, Symmetrical Communication, and Employee Outcomes. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(3), 256–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2014.908719
Ndruru, Y., Ndruru, Y., & Lawalata, M. (2024). Berbicara Dengan Logika: Strategi Komunikasi Yang Efektif Dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Harmoni: Jurnal Ilmu …, 2(2), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.59581/harmoni-widyakarya.v2i2.3049
Novotna, L. (2021). Freedom and Gender Equality in EU Family Policy Tools. Social Policy and Society, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746421000737
Padhy, M. K. (2015). Communication through Advocacy Advertising for Public Health Promotion. Media Watch, 6(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.15655/mw/2015/v6i1/55393
Putri, N. E., Helmi, H., Noer, M., & Yossyafra, Y. (2021). Systematic Literature Review (SLR) Dinamika Perencanaan Pembangunan Infrastruktur Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Public Policy, 7(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.35308/jpp.v7i2.3811
Ragon, K. A., & Reyes, D. V. (2023). Insider-Outsider Dynamics and Identity in Qualitative Studies of Social Movements (pp. 169–184). https://doi.org/10.1108/s0163-786x20230000047008
Rasmussen, A., Mäder, L. K., & Reher, S. (2018). With a Little Help From The People? The Role of Public Opinion in Advocacy Success. Comparative Political Studies, 51(2), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017695334
Rodriguez, N. S. (2016). Communicating global inequalities: How LGBTI asylum-specific NGOs use social media as public relations. Public Relations Review, 42(2), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.12.002
Rude, C. D. (2004). Toward an Expanded Concept of Rhetorical Delivery: The Uses of Reports in Public Policy Debates. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13(3), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1303_3
Sarbaitinil, S., Rudagi, R., Rahmat, I., Elfemi, N., & Isnaini, I. (2023). Expressing Philosophical Discourse In Pencak Silat As A Pillar of Character Education And Strengthening Social Ties In Society. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 3(2), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.51817/jpdr.v3i2.301
Thomas, R. (2022). Advocacy Journalism. In Communication. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756841-0281
Thrall, A. T., Stecula, D., & Sweet, D. (2014). May We Have Your Attention Please? Human-Rights NGOs and the Problem of Global Communication. International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(2), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213519132
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Aprilia Natasya April, Donna Ardila Aprillia Donna, Muhamad Maulana Maulana, Ruslan Ruslan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.











