Permasalahan dan Dampak dari Implementasi Sistem Pemilu Proporsional Terbuka terhadap Sistem Politik

Authors

  • Muhammad Revan Fauzano Makarim Student of Political Science
  • Khairul Fahmi Universitas Andalas

Keywords:

Election, Election System, Open List Representation

Abstract

The holding of elections is a form the implementation of democratic values ??in which the freedom of expression from citizens for the fulfillment of rights based on the principle for being free to choose and be elected. In its implementation, elections are related to legal aspects and will always experience legal dynamics in the context of each stage of its implementation. The dynamics of the law occur when the implementation of the election is in line with the changing of the legislation governing the implementation of the election which has been regulated periodically for its implementation. Then the enactment of Law Number 7 of 2017 on the Implementation of Elections by the House of Representative with the approval of the President. Stipulation of Law Number 7 of 2017 on the Implementation of Elections shows that there is a legal construction related to the handling of violations and disputes. The violations consist of election crimes, election administration violations, and violations of the code of ethics for election administrators. Then these problems have an impact on its implementation, one of which is in the spotlight is the application of the open proportional electoral system as regulated in Law Number 7 of 2017 on the Open Proportional Election System. The problems in the implementation of this electoral system have an impact on the political system, political parties, and government stability, which then leads to the vulnerability of money politics practices and then causes systematic chaos that disrupts the growth of democracy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, R. (2009). Mewujudkan pemilu yang lebih berkualitas: Pemilu legislatif. Rajawali Pers.

Aspinall, E. (2014). WHEN BROKERS BETRAY: Clientelism, Social Networks, and Electoral Politics in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 46(4), 545–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2014.960706

Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for Sale: Pemilihan Umum, Klientelisme, dan Negara di Indonesia. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (2015). Politik uang di Indonesia: Patronase dan klientelisme pada pemilu legislatif 2014. PolGov.

Asshiddiqqie, J. (2006). PENGANTAR ILMU HUKUM TATA NEGARA JILID II. 127.

Benda-Beckmann, F. von, & Benda-Beckmann, K. von. (2005). Mobile People, Mobile Law: Expanding Legal Relations in a Contracting World. Routledge.

Bolqiah, L. H., & Raffiudin, R. (2020). Dominasi Oligarki dan Ketidakhadiran Partai Politik Hijau di Indonesia. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 19(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.35967/njip.v19i2.112

Budiardjo, M. (2008). Dasar-dasar ilmu politik. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Croissant, A. (2003). Politik pemilu di asia tenggara dan asia timur: Judul asli electoral politics in southeast & east asia. Perpustakaan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian (STIK); pensil 324. http://library.stik-ptik.ac.id

Danial, & Warsiah. (2009). Metode Penulisan Karya Ilmiah. Alfabeta.

Mediaindonesia.com. (2016). Sistem Pemilu Proporsional Terbuka Terbatas dan Putusan Mk. https://mediaindonesia.com/opini/75911/sistem-pemilu-proporsional-terbuka-terbatas-dan-putusan-mk/. Diakses pada 12 April 2022. Pukul 20.27.

Fahmi, K. (2011). Pemilihan Umum dan Kedaulatan Rakyat. -. http://digilib.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/handle/15717717/17695

Greenpeace Indonesia. (2019). Ganti Rugi 18,9 Triliun Terkait Kasus Kebakaran dan Kerusakan Hutan Gagal Dibayar Sejumlah Perusahaan, Pemerintah Harus Mengambil Langkah Tegas. Greenpeace Indonesia. https://www.greenpeace.org/indonesia/siaran-pers/1103/ganti-rugi-189-triliun-terkait-kasus-kebakaran-dan-kerusakan-hutan-gagal-dibayar-sejumlah-perusahaan-pemerintah-harus-mengambil-langkah-tegas

Halim, A. (2014). DAMPAK SISTEM PROPORSIONAL TERBUKA TERHADAP PERILAKU POLITIK (STUDI KASUS MASYARAKAT SUMENEP MADURA DALAM PEMILIHAN LEGISLATIF 2014). 9, 11.

Hidayat, R. (2020). Sistem Pemilu Proporsional Terbuka Disebut Gagal Penuhi Lima Tujuan. hukumonline.com. http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/sistem-pemilu-proporsional-terbuka-disebut-gagal-penuhi-lima-tujuan-lt5edf301268f3f/. Diakses pada 12 April 2022. Pukul 21.42.

Linz, J. J., & Valenzuela, A. (1994). The Failure of Presidential Democracy. JHU Press.

Maharddhika. (2017). Sistem Pemilu Terbuka Terbatas dan Putusan MK – Rumah Pemilu. https://rumahpemilu.org/sistem-pemilu-terbuka-terbatas-dan-putusan-mk/. Diakses pada 12 April 2022. Pukul 1.42.

Mainwaring, C. P. of P. S. S., Mainwaring, S., Shugart, M. S., & Lange, P. (1997). Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.

Maulana, R. (2021). Demokrasi Indonesia Merusak Lingkungan. https://www.forestdigest.com/detail/1340/lingkungan-dan-demokrasi-indonesia/. Diakses pada 13 April 2022. Pukul 10.13.

Medcom.id. (2014, May 1). JE Sahetapy: Kejahatan Pemilu Bukti Pemerintah tidak Belajar. medcom.id. https://www.medcom.id/nasional/peristiwa/9K5WMAab-je-sahetapy-kejahatan-pemilu-bukti-pemerintah-tidak-belajar/. Diakses pada 13 April 2022. Pukul 2.22.

Ophuls, W. (1973). PROLOGUE TO A POLITICAL THEORY OF THE STEADY STATE: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE POLITICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CRISIS - ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/openview/3160d4a3afbb1276d3562fbd3b444815/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

Pahlevi, I. (2015). Sistem pemilu di Indonesia: Antara proporsional dan mayoritarian. P3DI Setjen DPR, Republik Indonesia dan Azza Grafika.

Ramadhan, M. N., & Oley, J. D. B. (2019). Klientelisme sebagai Perilaku Koruptif dan Demokrasi Banal. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 5(1), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v5i1.379

Ramdani, M. D., & Arisandi, F. (2014). PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN SISTEM PEMILIHAN UMUM DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT PROPORSIONAL DAFTAR TERBUKA. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 3(1), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v3i1.59

Ratnasara, S. E. (2019). Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Proposional Terbuka Pada Kualifikasi Calon Legislatif. JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH, 1(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v1i3.13077

Riwanto, A. (2015). KORELASI PENGATURAN SISTEM PEMILU PROPORSIONAL TERBUKA BERBASIS SUARA TERBANYAK DENGAN KORUPSI POLITIK DI INDONESIA. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v4i1.8624

Rukin. (2021). METODOLOGI PENELITIAN KUALITATIF EDISI REVISI. Jakad Media Publishing.

Saryono. (2010). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Alfabeta, Bandung.

Sinarsih, S. (2021). Sistem Pemilu Proporsional Terbuka terhadap Money Politic di Indonesia. Al-Balad: Journal of Constitutional Law, 3(1), 2.

Stokes, S. C., Dunning, T., Nazareno, M., & Brusco, V. (2013). Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge University Press.

Sugiyono. (2005). MEMAHAMI PENELITIAN KUALITATIF (Bandung). Alfabeta. //digilib.unigres.ac.id%2Findex.php%2Findex.php%3Fp%3Dshow_detail%26id%3D966%26keywords%3D

Wati, E. P. (2015). Pemilu Sebagai Wujud Kedaulatan Rakyat. E-Jurnal Hukum.

Widianto, E. (2021). Praktik Demokrasi di Indonesia Ancam Lingkungan? Mongabay.Co.Id. https://www.mongabay.co.id/2021/10/09/praktik-demokrasi-di-indonesia-ancam-lingkungan/. Diakses pada 13 April 2022. Pukul 23.59.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30