Penyuluhan Hukum tentang Pembuktian dalam Hukum Perdata di Desa Matang Seping Kecamatan Banda Mulia

Authors

  • Meta Suriyani Universita Samudra
  • Saiful Anwar Universitas Samudra
  • Rusli Rusli Universitas Samudra
  • Yuni Elisdawati Universitas Samudra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58835/nawadeepa.v4i2.461

Keywords:

Counseling, Evidence, Civil Law

Abstract

The activities of the Matang Seping Village community, Banda Mulia District, Aceh Aceh Tamiang Regency ,when carrying out civil acts such as borrowing, renting, pawning, debts, buying and selling, waqf,  or other cooperation are carried out verbally, often without witnesses to witness it. The community does not understand that letters and witnesses can clarify the problems that occur and provide evidence to resolve problems, either through customary court procedures or district courts. The partner group comes from the community. This community service activity is carried out by providing legal counseling on evidence in civil law to the community so that they prepare and use evidence in accordance with applicable law. The evidence recognized in civil cases consists of written evidence, witness evidence, suspicions, confessions, and oaths. The absence of evidence or weak evidence from the consequences of civil law acts will cause losses to one party. In addition, electronic evidence such as voice recordings, photos, videos, voice notes, or emails can also be used as evidence in court.

References

Bagenda, C., Rizkia, N. D., Fardiansyah, H., Hidayat, M. R., Soleh, Y. P., Usman, R., ... & Kholis, I. (2023). (2023). Hukum Perdata. Penerbit Widin.

Dsalimunthe, D. (2017). Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi Dalam Perspektif Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (BW). Al-Maqasid, 3(1), 16.

Febri Rahmadhani. (2020). Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta di Bawah Tangan Waarmerking Dalam Perspektif Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Recital Review, 2(2), 93–111.

Febriandini, T. S. (2014). Studi Kekuatan Pembuktian Surat Pada Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan Negeri. Jurnal Verstek, 2(1), 176–187.

Hamzah, A. (2017). Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Juanda, E. (2016). Kekuatan Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Perdata Menurut Hukum Positif Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 4(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.25157/jigj.v4i1.409

Juliati Br Ginting. (2022). Kekuatan Mengikat Perjanjian Secara Lisan. The Juris, 6(2), 429–436. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v6i2.612

Listiyanto, A. (2017). Pembaharuan Sistem Hukum Acara Pidana. Rechtsvinding, 1–4. https://rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id/view/view_online.php?id=234

Momuat, O. (2014). Alat Bukti Tulisan Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan. Lex Privatum, Vol.II/No.1/Jan-Mar/2014, II(8), 137.

Muljono, B. E. (2017). Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Dibawah Tangan. Jurnal Independent, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v5i1.59

Nur Azra, D., Annisa Qutrunnadaa, F., Simamora, Y., Dio Wijatmika, R., & Siswajayanthy, F. (2024). Perkembangan dan Pembaharuan Terhadap Hukum Perdata di Indonesia Beserta Permasalahan Eksekusi dan Mediasi. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 2(1), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v2i1.204

Rudy, D. G., & Mayasari, I. D. A. D. (2021). Keabsahan Alat Bukti Surat Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata Melalui Persidangan Secara Elektronik. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 9(1), 167–174. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPP/article/view/31440

Septianingsih, K. A., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Dewi, A. A. S. L. (2020). Kekuatan Alat Bukti Akta Otentik Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2(3), 336–340. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.3.2584.336-340

Tampanguma, C. I., Mamesah, E. L., & Muaja, H. S. (2021). Kekuatan Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perjanjian Akta Dibawah Tangan. Lex Privatum, Vol. IX(No. 11), 232–240.

Tomayahu, M. G. R. dan S. (2020). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Al-Himayah, 4, 142–159. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/indigenious/article/viewFile/74712

Downloads

Published

2025-06-24

Issue

Section

Articles