Integration of Sectoral Policies: Potentials and Obstacles in a Complex and Interconnected World

Kwadwo Yeboah Botah

doi:10.58835/jspi.v3i3.210

Authors

Kwadwo Yeboah Botah Technical University of Berlin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58835/jspi.v3i3.210

Keywords:

Environmental Policy Integration (EPI), Policy Integration, Sustainable Development, Policy Appraisal, Cross-Cutting Policy Problems

Abstract

Over the past decade, a myriad of challenges such as climate change, food insecurity, flooding, drought, biodiversity loss, and inequalities have emerged across the global landscape. These problems are not only characterized by their complex origins and solutions but also embedded across multiple sectors, each with distinct agendas and uncertainties. Given this complexity, the concept of integrating policies across sectors has gained increased attention both politically and scholarly. Through a comprehensive review approach, this paper investigates the complex and multifaceted global challenges. It examines the role of sector-specific policies and the integration of these policies in addressing these challenges as well as obstacles to change. The findings underscore the existence of multiple complex and interrelated global challenges spanning many sectors with adverse national and local impacts. The paper revealed the substantial contributions of sectoral policies in confronting these intricate cross-cutting issues, while also highlighting their complexities. To overcome these challenges, the paper argues that the integration of sector-specific policies is central. By ensuring the integration of sectoral approaches, inconsistencies across sectors, fragmentation, and conflicts between policies are minimized. The paper contends that despite notable advances and recognition of policy integration, political commitment, complex application, and effective utilization are the primary challenges that need to be tackled to enjoy their full potential. The paper thus emphasized the need to establish efficient institutional machinery and unwavering political support for EPI. This strategic approach is essential to effectively confront the complex cross-cutting challenges, promote policy rationality and advance sustainable transformation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adelle C, & Russel D. (2013). Climate Policy Integration: a case of déjà vu? Environmental Policy and Governance 23(1): 1–12.

Adelle, C., Pallemaerts, M., & Chiavari, J. (2009). Climate change and energy security in Europe: Policy integration and its limits. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies.

Candel, J. J., & Biesbroek, R. (2016). Toward a processual understanding of policy integration. Policy Sciences, 49, 211-231.

Cebollada, A. (2009). ‘Mobility and labour market exclusion in the Barcelona Metropolitan Region’, Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp.226-233.

Cejudo, G. M., & Trein, P. (2023). Pathways to policy integration: A subsystem approach. Policy Sciences, 56(1), 9-27.

Domorenok, E., Graziano, P., & Polverari, L. (2021). Introduction: Policy integration and institutional capacity: Theoretical, conceptual and empirical challenges. Policy and Society, 40(1), 1-18.

Dryzek, J.S., (2014). Institutions for the Anthropocene: Governance in a changing earth system. British Journal of Political Science, 46(4), pp.937-956.

EEA. (2007). Europe’s Environment: the Fourth Assessment. European Environmental Agency: Copenhagen.

EEA. (2009). Water Resources Across Europe-Confronting Water Scarcity and Drought. European Environmental Agency: Copenhagen.

Eggenberger, M. & Partidário, M.R., (2000). Development of a framework to assist the integration of environmental, social and economic issues in spatial planning. Impact assessment and project appraisal, 18(3), pp.201-207.

Eriksson, L., (2016). Policy integration for sustainable transport development: Case studies of two Swedish regions (Doctoral dissertation, Linköping University Electronic Press).

European Commission. (2007). Limiting Global Climate Change to 2 Degrees Celsius – the Way Ahead for 2020 and Beyond, COM (2007) 2. European Commission: Brussels.

European Environment Agency (EEA). (2003). Europe’s Environment: the Third Assessment. EEA: Copenhagen.

Fekete, H., Kuramochi, T., Roelfsema, M., den Elzen, M., Forsell, N., Höhne, N., Luna, L., Hans, F., Sterl, S., Olivier, J. & van Soest, H., (2021). A review of successful climate change mitigation policies in major emitting economies and the potential of global replication. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 137, p.110602.

Hong, S-Y. & Lee, C-W (2001). Coastal Zone Management, Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences, Academic Press, 2001, Pages 496-499, https://doi.org/10.1006/rwos.2001.0497.

Hickman, R. & D. Banister (2007), ‘Looking over the horizon: transport and reduced CO2 emissions in the UK by 2030’, Transport Policy, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 377-387.

Hine, J. & Grieco, M. (2003), ‘Scatters and clusters in time and space: implications for delivering integrated and inclusive transport’, Transport Policy, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 299-306.

Hull, A. (2011). Transport matters: integrated approaches to planning city-regions. London: Routledge.

IEA [International Energy Agency]. (2014). World Energy Outlook 2013. Paris.

Jordan, A. & A. Lenschow (2010). 'Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review.' Environmental Policy and Governance 20(3): 147-158.

Lafferty, W. (2002). Adapting government practice to the goals of sustainable development. Improving Governance for Sustainable Development. OECD Seminar 22-23 November 2001, Paris: OECD.

Lenschow A (ed.). (2002). Environmental Policy Integration: Greening Sectoral Policies in Europe. Earthscan: London.

Ling T, T. (2002). Delivering joined-up government in the UK: Dimensions, issues and problems. Public Administration, 80(4), 615-642.

Meijers, E., & Stead, D. (2004, December). Policy integration: what does it mean and how can it be achieved? A multi-disciplinary review.

Nilsson, M. N., & Persson, A. S. (2003). Framework for analysing environmental policy integration. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 5(4), 333-359.

Nilsson, M., et al. (2012). Understanding policy coherence: Analytical framework and examples of sector environment policy interactions in the EU. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(6), 395–423.

OECD (2001). Environmental outlook. Retrieved from: http//213.253.134.29/oecd/pdfs/browseit/9701011E.PDF

OECD (2004). Accounting Frameworks for Sustainable Development: What have we learnt? In: Measuring Sustainable Development: Integrated Economic, Environmental and Social Frameworks. OECD, Paris, France.

Persson, Å., & Runhaar, H. (2018). Conclusion: Drawing lessons for Environmental Policy Integration and prospects for future research. Environmental science and policy, 85, 141-145.

Persson, A., (2004). Environmental policy integration: an introduction. PINTS–Policy Integration for Sustainability Background Paper. Stockholm Environment Institute: Stockholm.

Persson, Å., Runhaar, H., Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., Mullally, G., Russel, D., Widmer, A., (2018). Editorial: environmental policy integration: taking stock of policy practice in different contexts. Environ. Sci. Policy 85 (July (2018)), 113–115.

Peters, B. G. (2018). The challenge of policy coordination. Policy Design and Practice, 1(1), 1–11.

Puhe, J., & Ulrich, B. (2012). Global climate change and human impacts on forest ecosystems: postglacial development, present situation and future trends in Central Europe (Vol. 143). Springer Science & Business Media.

Runhaar, H., Driessen, P. & Uittenbroek, C., (2014). Towards a systematic framework for the analysis of environmental policy integration. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(4), pp.233-246.

Russel, D., Beck, S., Campos, I., Capriolo, A., Castellari, S., den Uyl, R. M., ... & Weiland, S. (2018). Analyzing the policy framework for climate change adaptation. In Adapting to climate change in Europe (pp. 273-313). Elsevier.

Santos, G., Behrendt, H. & Teytelboym, A. (2010), Policy Instruments for Sustainable Road Transport, Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 28, N1, pp. 46-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2010.03.002

Schmidt, N., Fleig, A., (2018). Global patterns of national climate policies: analyzing 171 country portfolios on climate policy integration. Environ. Sci. Policy 84, 177–185.

Stead, D., Geerlings, H., & Meijers, E. (2004). Policy Integration in Practice - The integration of land use planning, transport and environmental policy-making in Denmark, England and Germany. Delft: DUP Science.

UN (2015b). Policy integration in government in pursuit of the sustainable development goals. Report of the expert group meeting held on 28 and 29 January 2015 at United Nations

UN [United Nations] (2015a). Adoption of the Paris Agreement. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9.

UNEP (2019). Emissions gap report 2019. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme; 2019. https://doi.org/10.18356/ff6d1a84-en

UNFCCC (2015). Paris agreement - decision 1/CP.21 - report of the conference of the Parties on its twenty-first session, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; 2015.

WEF. (2015). Global risks 2015, 10th Edition. Geneva: World Economic Forum.